Product details:
Publisher: Penguin.
Paperback, 358 pages.
Release date: May 7th 2013.
Rating: 3½ out of 5.
Ages: 12+
Reviewed by: Arianne.
Stephen has been invisible for practically his whole life — because of a curse his grandfather, a powerful cursecaster, bestowed on Stephen’s mother before Stephen was born. So when Elizabeth moves to Stephen’s NYC apartment building from Minnesota, no one is more surprised than he is that she can see him. A budding romance ensues, and when Stephen confides in Elizabeth about his predicament, the two of them decide to dive headfirst into the secret world of cursecasters and spellseekers to figure out a way to break the curse. But things don’t go as planned, especially when Stephen’s grandfather arrives in town, taking his anger out on everyone he sees. In the end, Elizabeth and Stephen must decide how big of a sacrifice they’re willing to make for Stephen to become visible — because the answer could mean the difference between life and death. At least for Elizabeth.
Invisibility is a difficult one
to rate. I really wanted to adore it – there’s a lot of love for it floating
around book blogs these days – but I just couldn’t quite force myself to enjoy
a story which fell flat in so many critical places.
This book is told from two
different viewpoints. Stephen was born invisible - the result of a horrific
curse cast by his grandfather before Stephen was even born. New girl Elizabeth
secretly feels invisible - but her sharp Minnesota tongue soon makes short work of
that when she arrives in NYC. One person the multiple narrative fails to
feature is Elizabeth's
younger brother, Laurie - though I really wish it had. He feels like the most
visible person on the planet, especially when the bullies come for him.
But when Elizabeth and Stephen begin to fall in love, a whole new dimension opens up for them - literally. Thrust into a world bound by magic and by tradition, an epic battle overtakes all the other problems they thought they had. With Stephen’s grandfather back in town and cursecasters on the warpath, it's time to take action - or they'll lose their lives as well as their love.
But when Elizabeth and Stephen begin to fall in love, a whole new dimension opens up for them - literally. Thrust into a world bound by magic and by tradition, an epic battle overtakes all the other problems they thought they had. With Stephen’s grandfather back in town and cursecasters on the warpath, it's time to take action - or they'll lose their lives as well as their love.
Reading Invisibility is kind of a package deal. You have to
put up with the hype and the huge reputations of the authors, and you have to
suspend your disbelief long enough for the cool contemporary meets paranormal
romance concept to work. Realism isn’t this book’s strong point and you have to
accept that from the word go. It’s such an obvious issue, in fact, that the
opening moments of Stephen’s no-nonsense narrative address it directly.
Once you get past those first few world-building,
backstory-telling pages, the book is very much a thematic tale. Equal parts
action and anguish, there is an all-round emphasis on where the characters have
come from and where they might be going.
And of course, Levithan and Cremer have taken real care to
bulk up the story with countless moral and intrapersonal questions. The answers
are never too far away, but you’ll have to look past the immediate surface to
find the ones that matter.
The mythology behind Stephen’s supernatural ability is the
main plot motivator and I really like the way the book is built around it. It’s
unlike anything I’ve ever read before and I loved that – it was one of the best
executed elements of the book.
Unfortunately the New
York setting still feels cliché and overused even
when the unique concepts of cursecasters and spellseekers are taken into
account. NYC feels like such a default location in the American young adult
scene and I just wanted something more. The two worlds are so different they
should mesh together easily in the hands of these two very capable authors, but
they don’t.
In contrast, I love the differences between Stephen and Elizabeth's voices.
Stephen is written in typical David Levithan style. He's straightforward,
matter-of-fact and devoid of flashiness – it’s Elizabeth who is more of a
surprise. (I refuse to call her Jo. As a nickname, it just doesn't make sense!)
She'll never back down from a fight, but she's also brash and frequently
alienates herself from the reader, making her hard to consistently like.
Stephen and Elizabeth fall in love with little fire or
passion, but it's still preferable to the reasonless romance featured in Andrea
Cremer's Nightshade series. Up to this point both perspectives seem a little
detached from one another but the power of dual authorship is perhaps most
apparent here. Instead of tumbling down the rabbit hole of instantaneous and
undying love, Stephen and Elizabeth are honest and just want to be there for
each other. It would have been really cute, if only they could have lightened
up and had some fun together.
Laurie is the saving grace of
the cast. He's Elizabeth's
brother, but there's a clear Levithan influence on him. He's funny, sweet and
in truth, he’s the real hero of the book. His belief in Stephen never wavers
and he shows extraordinary courage in the face of violence and hatred.
Laurie's a big part of the
reason why I'm really hoping for a sequel, despite my reservations about Elizabeth. It may have
its flaws, but Invisibility has a whole lot of potential packed behind its
innocent cover.
In short: Simply put, Invisibility could do with some more
energy and spark in its narrative. I didn't love it, but in the hands of the
right reader, this contemporary-with-a-difference has the potential to become a
real favourite.
--Arianne.
This does sound like a great read Arianne, but I probably would rate this book of a similar rating to you because of the issues you mentioned, I like my characters to have a bit of fun too. And I can't stop laughing at Elizabeth's nickname, Jo? Where did that come from? Lovely review as always Arianne! :)
ReplyDeletePretty much all the reviews I've read have said the same thing. Good but had a few issues. I think I'm going read Two Boys Kissing instead.
ReplyDeleteI always think books like this are hard to rate - and I'm glad to find out I'm not the only one! It's been a while since I read Invisibility (no re-reads for this one from me, I'm afraid) but I think it comes from her liking the book Little Women.
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed the review, Karen. Do let us know what you think of Two Boys Kissing!
ReplyDeleteI have a copy of this but I put it aside when I started seeing the less than glowing reviews. I love the idea of this story, but I don't always care for Levithan's characters. But it sounds like Cremer's was the issue here. Hard to like a book when the heroine is hit and miss for you. Wonderful review, Leanna. I think this will sit on the shelf a little longer. :)
ReplyDeleteOoops, sorry, I didn't see that it was Arianne who reviewed this! Wonderful review, Arianne!
ReplyDeleteGreat review, Arianne. I felt the same way about Invisibility! I was hoping for a much more compelling read given that Andrea Cremer and David Levithan wrote it, but ultimately, it felt rather "meh" for me. I'm glad I am not alone in that. The best part of the book was Laurie--loved that character too!
ReplyDeleteI can't say I blame you for holding off on reading this one, Rachel! It's difficult not to be disappointed when such a fantastic concept is let down by other parts of the book. Maybe one day it will will find a reader who completely adores it, but sadly I'm not that person!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Rachel :)
ReplyDeleteI thought exactly the same thing, Christina. It was just so 'meh' and 'average' compared to the other books I was reading at the time. It could have been so much better. I expected more from Andrea Cremer and David Levithan, to be perfectly honest.
ReplyDelete